There are countless web development agencies and DIY tools that claim strong PageSpeed scores. We don’t independently verify each of those claims. But at Faeb, we operate differently.
We make explicit guarantees, and we deliver them consistently in production—not just in controlled or temporary environments.
What PageSpeed Actually Measures
Google PageSpeed Insights evaluates how a website behaves for real users. It measures whether a site loads quickly, remains accessible, follows best practices, and is structured in a way search engines can interpret reliably.
These signals are combined into the overall Performance score, which plays a meaningful role in visibility, usability, and Google Business Profile rankings.
Because of this, we do not treat PageSpeed as a vanity metric. We treat it as a system constraint.
The Faeb PageSpeed Guarantee
For websites built and delivered by Faeb, we guarantee the following scores on Google PageSpeed Insights:
- Accessibility score: 100
- Best Practices score: 100
- SEO score: 100
- Overall Performance score: 91+
These guarantees are not based on local testing, demo environments, or short-lived optimizations.
They are measured on live, production websites.
How We Validate Performance in Production
At Faeb, we take a pragmatic approach to performance.
A website scoring 99 in a development or staging environment is not considered complete. Performance is only validated after the site is live, receiving traffic, and running real-world integrations.
We track field data to ensure that performance remains stable after launch.
This matters because performance commonly degrades over time as:
- Traffic increases
- Analytics and tracking scripts are added
- Ecommerce functionality is enabled
- Third-party services are integrated
Our process is designed to prevent that degradation.
A Practical Example: Analytics Without Performance Loss
Google Analytics is one of the most common causes of PageSpeed drops.
In typical WordPress setups, analytics are added via plugins, including Google’s own Site Kit or tools like MonsterInsights. When analytics scripts are injected directly into the page lifecycle, performance often drops by 10–15 points. This behaviour is not specific to WordPress and can be observed in custom-coded websites as well.
We do not integrate analytics this way.
Instead, analytics scripts are introduced through controlled JavaScript execution, with deferral and delayed loading strategies. This ensures that data is collected without blocking rendering or degrading PageSpeed scores.
This is one example of many architectural decisions that protect performance in real-world conditions.
Real Websites, Real Field Data
The following projects demonstrate how this approach holds up across different industries and traffic profiles.
1. Digipaisa
An ecommerce store built on WooCommerce, handling approximately 5,000 daily visitors. It includes PhonePe payment integration and Google Analytics, yet consistently scores 99 on mobile PageSpeed Insights. Achieving this level of performance in ecommerce environments is uncommon, but it is delivered here.
2. Rekha Sutra
A local business website for an architecture firm, operating for several months with roughly 2,000 daily visitors. The site continues to score 99 on mobile PageSpeed Insights under normal production conditions.
![Rekha Sutra - PageSpeed Performance [Mobile]](https://faeb.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/rekha-sutra-mobile-speed.avif)
3. Ziist Studio
A portfolio website for a graphic design studio. Despite being image-heavy and built on WordPress, the homepage scores 97 on mobile PageSpeed Insights.
![Ziist Studio PageSpeed [Mobile]](https://faeb.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ziist-pagespeed-mobile.png)
4. The Shabaka
A multilingual news platform operating in English, Arabic, Urdu, and Hindi. News websites typically struggle to cross a PageSpeed score of 70 due to dynamic content and publishing frequency. This site consistently scores 98 on mobile, even under production load.
Consistency Across Domains
All of the websites above score:
- 100 in Accessibility
- 100 in Best Practices
- 100 in SEO
They also span very different use cases—ecommerce, local business, portfolio, and multilingual news publishing. This consistency demonstrates that the process is not domain-specific or dependent on reduced functionality.
Why This Works
Performance at Faeb is the result of:
- Standardized internal processes
- Clean architectural decisions
- Controlled third-party integrations
- Continuous validation in production
- A team that treats performance as a system requirement, not a post-launch fix
We don’t promise scores we can’t sustain.
We design for them, validate them in the real world, and deliver what we guarantee—consistently.