Clients often expect websites to go live as quickly as possible. Requests for three-day delivery are common, and in some cases, the expectation is set at twenty-four hours.
At Faeb, we do not operate on these timelines. This is not due to a lack of speed or technical capability. It is a deliberate decision based on how websites behave over time, how search engines evaluate them, and how security and accessibility must be enforced in real-world environments.
A website going live is not the moment it is “finished.” It is the moment it becomes exposed to users, search engines, automated crawlers, and attackers. When websites are rushed to launch, design decisions are finalized without validation, performance issues are masked by short-term optimization tools, security is layered on after deployment, and accessibility is treated as optional. These shortcuts often appear acceptable at launch but create structural and operational problems later.
Understanding Delivery Timeline:
At Faeb, the launch date is treated as a verification checkpoint, not a deadline.
Every website project follows a structured process where design, performance, security, and accessibility are treated as interdependent systems. PageSpeed scores are achieved by design decisions made at the layout, asset, and rendering level, not through optimization tools or post-build patches that frequently break layouts or introduce regressions. This approach requires more time upfront, but it produces websites that remain fast, stable, and predictable after launch.
Delivery timelines depend on the type of website being built. A single-page landing experience does not carry the same technical or structural requirements as a multi-page website with blogging, integrations, or ecommerce. Treating all websites as equivalent leads to compromised outcomes.
Scrapping 5 Days Delivery Model:
Faeb does offer a 3–5 day delivery window, but only under defined conditions. This timeline applies exclusively to landing page projects, where a single primary page is delivered with focused intent and minimal system complexity. Clients can still have a website live within five days under this model.
Earlier, similar timelines were offered for broader website builds, but that program was fully discontinued because it required compromises in design validation, performance testing, and long-term maintainability, which did not align with Faeb’s standards.
Why Do Business Owners Choose Faeb:
Clients work with Faeb for outcomes that are measurable and durable. These include the following:
- PageSpeed scores consistently above 91 achieved by design rather than gimmicks.
- Security enforced at the WordPress core level rather than through plugins.
- Full accessibility compliance so websites are usable by humans and interpretable by search engines and AI systems without retrofitting.
Each of these outcomes requires deliberate engineering and due diligence throughout the design and development process.
New Delivery Timelines:
The following table outlines typical delivery timelines under standard scope conditions:
| Website Type | Typical Delivery Time | Scope Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Landing Page | 3–5 days | Single primary page, focused intent, minimal navigation and system depth |
| 9-Page Website with Blog System | 15 days | Multi-page structure with content hierarchy and blogging functionality |
| Multi-Page Website (Non-Ecommerce) | 15 days | Informational or service-based websites without transactional flows |
| Website with Ecommerce Integration | 20 days | Product catalog, checkout flow, payment integration, and system hardening |
All timelines are indicative rather than rigid guarantees. Factors such as content readiness, third-party integrations, custom functionality, revision cycles, and scope changes can affect delivery. Any timeline adjustments are communicated clearly during project scoping discussions and documented in service-level agreements.
Faeb does not optimize for speed of launch. We optimize for correctness at launch. A website that launches later but remains fast, secure, accessible, and stable is more valuable than one that launches quickly and requires continuous correction afterward.